Chapter One
LISTEN
"I was put here to play music, and interpretmusic.... I might do a lot of things, but the mainthing that I love, that comes before everything, evenbreathing, is music."
—Miles Davis
"Listen." Miles: The Autobiography opens with this word, immediately hitting a bull's-eye.It goes straight to the heart of Miles Davis.
Listen before breathing. Miles had a different way of listening. To music. To sound.To people. To the rhythm of the times. To time and space. To understand Miles we haveto listen to the way he expressed himself, in music, words, lifestyle, and life choices. Listeningis central. It's what he taught the musicians who played with him. It's what hetaught his audiences as well.
Bassist Gary Peacock described Miles as "by far the greatest listener that I have everexperienced in a musical group." His colleague Dave Holland observed that Miles had"the best understanding of time, space, and movement of anybody I have ever workedwith." Keyboardist Adam Holzman stated, "It may be a funny thing to say for a musician,but Miles taught me how to listen." Percussionist Badal Roy said that the mainthing he learned from Miles was "to play from the heart and to listen."
Miles used to tell his musicians, "When you play music, don't play the idea that's there,play the next idea. Wait. Wait another beat, or maybe two, and maybe you'll have somethingthat's more fresh. Don't just play from the top of your head, but listen and try to playa little deeper." Miles also advised his musicians, "Don't play what's there. Play what's notthere." He might have said: "Don't listen to what's there, listen to what's not there."
Other than during the second half of the '80s, Miles rarely rehearsed his bands.Instead, he instructed his musicians to practice on the bandstand. He got angry withthem if they practiced at home or in their hotel rooms, saying "How are you going torehearse the future?" He wanted them to be fully present with, to listen to, the music inthe present moment. "Of all of those in the band, Miles is the most easily influenced byoutside events. He reflects everything he feels in his playing immediately," remarked anunnamed band member.
Miles wanted his sidemen to enter into a relationship with music using what Zen calls"beginner's mind"—never being on autopilot, never just following habit energy, butalways alert, ready for the unexpected, right here, right now. "Miles did not want me tocome to the rehearsals," guitarist Pete Cosey recalled. "He wanted to keep things fresh.Part of that is knowing what to play and what not to play. The way you do that is to beable to listen to what is going on around you. When you come into any situation, it's thebest thing to do: to listen. That is how you learn."
Listening requires awareness, paying attention. Miles taught both by example. A wordused by many musicians who worked with him is "focus." Dave Holland said, "Therewas a tremendous sense of focus coming from him that influenced everybody. We wereall drawn in by it, it was almost like a vortex. Once you were in its sphere of influence,there was a certain magic that seemed to be happening." Drummer Jack DeJohnetteremarked, "Playing with Miles was about being focused, and about being open to wherethe music takes you. His sound focused your attention on him and the music. Sometimesthis meant leading and sometimes this meant following. He just had that magic, he hadthat power, that special gift."
Miles's unique listening awareness rubbed off on the musicians around him. In hispresence they often found themselves raising their awareness and playing to new andunexpected heights. In doing so they exemplified Miles's adage: "Play what you knowand play above what you know." Guitarist Sonny Sharrock only played with Miles forone day in 1970, but this was enough to change his approach to the guitar, making himrealize that playing music is about "really listening, the way Miles listened; to hear thepiece to the end right from the first note, and to see what the space is going to be in thepiece." Guitarist John McLaughlin commented, "Miles has the capacity to draw out ofpeople things that even surprise the musicians themselves. He's been a guru of sorts to alot of people. He was certainly a musical mentor to me."
Miles stated that when listening to his music, "I always listen to what I can leaveout." He listened to what's not there—to the space behind the notes, to the silence fromwhich music emerges and in which it is framed—trying to find the best balance betweenthat space and the notes that furnish it. One of Miles's big discoveries was that this oftenrequires fewer notes, rather than more. As a result, his economy of playing and usage ofspace became legendary. Miles always played between the lines, implying notes, suggestinga mood with minimal material, stretching the "less is more" maxim to new levels.
Early in 1985, when working on the album Aura, Miles told a Danish interviewer: "Idon't believe in wasting any phrases, no matter how small, how soft. With phrases comesrhythm. I don't waste rhythm either. The rhythm can throw off the melody and it getslost. So you have to know what the phrases mean, what the notes mean. A lot of musiciansdon't! They play a note, and they don't know what it means, they just know `that'sa raised ninth, that's a ...' whatever. You should tell them what it means, then musicianswon't go to sleep. That's very important."
Guitarist John Scofield said, "He expressed himself in a virtuoso way, but not with alot of notes. He had this ability to strip things down and to make it profound. When mostpeople play just one note, it's not so hot. But he found the right one to play. It was impossiblefor anybody else to do what he did because he was so unique. He was a teacher forus all." Keith Jarrett, Gary Peacock, and Jack DeJohnette wrote, "Miles was the authenticminimalist (where, although there are so few notes, there was so much in those notes). Nomatter how much noise there was around him, Miles always came from silence, the notesexisting in a purity all their own." Producer and arranger Quincy Jones concurred,"Miles always played the most unexpected note, and the one that is the perfect note."
By contrast, many musicians tend to overplay, and Miles joked that because "they playtoo many fucking notes" they need to go to "Notes Anonymous." He spent much of hislife teaching musicians the virtues of space, of silence, of phrasing, of waiting, of economyof notes and ideas, and most of all, of focus and listening. He remembered about percussionistAirto Moreira, "When he first came with me he played too loud and didn't listento what was happening with the music. I would tell him to stop banging and playingso loud, and just to listen more." According to Moreira, Miles just instructed him withthe aphorism, "Don't bang, just play," leaving him to figure out what this meant. Moreiraconcluded, "He wanted me to hear the music, and then play some sounds."
Illustrating how his listening awareness was always present—not just in music, but ineveryday life—Miles once remarked, "Rhythm is all around us, even if you stumble."An anecdote from his time in Malibu in the late '80s illustrates the same point. One dayMiles was stopped by a police officer for speeding. "I wasn't speeding, and in any case,my speedometer isn't working," Miles protested. "So how can you know how fast you'regoing?" the officer asked. "I can hear it," Miles replied.
So listen. Listen to what's not there. Listen between the lines, of words, of music,of Miles.
* * *
"Listen. The greatest feeling I ever had in my life—with my clothes on—was when I firstheard Diz and Bird together in St. Louis, Missouri, back in 1944.... Music all up in mybody, and that's what I wanted to hear.... I'm always looking for it, listening and feelingfor it, though, trying to feel it in and through the music I play every day."
Throughout his life, Miles's main focus was unearthing the meaning of music, delvingfor the feeling of that moment in 1944, which is the ultimate a musician can experience.Guitarist Robert Fripp described it as the point at which "we are fully alive in thepresent moment and totally alert to the musical impulse." Miles was single-minded andegoless in the pursuit of this aim, saying, "You gotta get rid of your ego," and "Menhave the biggest egos! ... All of them will listen, but if they do it, they'll do it once. Thenthe ego comes back. A man's ego is something else."
Jo Gelbard, the artist who worked with Miles when he got into painting during the'80s and who was also his partner from 1986 to his death, commented, "He had no egoin music. That's why he had his back to the audience, because he could hear the bandbetter and direct them. As opposed to, `This is Miles Davis, and who cares who's behindme.' It was never just about him and his horn. He was always part of the group that waswith him."
Lydia DeJohnette, wife of Jack, knew Miles well. "In music there was no arroganceto his ego," she remarked. "Being on stage was never about him, but always about musicalinspiration, no matter where it came from. It made him happy to feel that inspiration.Sometimes he'd look at Jack and say, `You know?' and Jack would go, `Yeah, Iknow.' There was a knowing that they shared about the musical field, and it is whereMiles felt connected with other people."
Jack DeJohnette added: "People were often worried about their personal contributionsand their egos, but Miles was thinking of it as a team. He also knew that, whateverwas going on, the sound of his horn could galvanize everything. Miles heard the finishedthing." Keyboardist Herbie Hancock made a similar point: "Miles is an incredible teamworker. He listens to what everybody does, and he uses that and what he plays makeswhat everybody does sound better."
Miles's ability to focus and raise the level of awareness of the members of his bands wasperplexing. Countless musicians who worked with Miles recounted stories of how he hada life-changing impact on them, and many talk about him in near-transcendental terms.Jarrett, Peacock, and DeJohnette called Miles "a medium, a transformer, a touchstone, amagnetic field." The people who were interviewed for this book used words like "mystical,""guru," "sorcerer," "shaman," "teacher," "magician," "Merlin," or "Zen teacher."
"Miles gave me myself," bassist Michael Henderson said. "He gave me something thatbelonged to me. When I came to play with him, I became `me.' Like everybody else whowas with him. We all found ourselves. We found exactly who we were and what weshould be doing as far as being in the music industry, and in life."
"I found my musical identity through playing with Miles," echoed Henderson's colleagueMarcus Miller. "The first time I played with him, in 1980, I was scared like hell.We were recording a track called `Aïda.' He played me F-sharp and G and said, `That'sit.' So I asked, `That's it?' `Yeah.' So I played only F-sharp and G. Miles stopped the bandand asked, `What are you doing, man? Are you just going to play these two notes? Is thatall you're going to do?' So I started to do all sorts of variations. He stopped the band again,and said, `Man, why are you playing so much? Just play F-sharp and G, and then shut up.'So I thought, `Oh, he's just playing with me. This is a test.' I realized I just had to playand not worry about him. That's what I did and this time he let the whole take go by.Miles had great people skills in the sense of bringing out the best in you as a musician. Hewas great precisely because he wasn't communicating that much verbally. He made youfind it on your own. Just like those martial arts teachers who point you in a direction andtell you a puzzling story that you have to analyze yourself. Or like those student-masterrelationships where the student can't understand why the master has him painting fences,and later on realizes, `Oh yes, it's because ...' It was the same thing with Miles."
Miller's analogy with fence painting comes from the movie The Karate Kid, in whicha Zen-like Asian martial arts teacher has his pupil painting fences as part of his apprenticeship.John McLaughlin also drew the Zen parallel, saying "Miles in the studio directedvery closely, but with very obscure statements. He was like a Zen master. He would giveyou very strange directions that were very difficult to understand, very obscure. But Ithink that was his intention, as it is with a Zen master. They will say something to you,and your mind will not be able to deal with it on a rational level. And so he made youact in a subconscious way, which was the best way. He had this great gift of pulling thebest things out of people, without them even realizing."
Palle Mikkelborg, the Danish trumpeter and composer who worked with Miles onAura, wrote in his liner notes, "Musically, Miles is to me what a Zen teacher is spiritually."Mikkelborg explained, "I have talked to a lot of people who have been to Japanand who have studied Zen. They say that sometimes in Zen you'll be told things whichyou don't understand, but you just have a feeling that what they say ... is right. Thesame with Miles, he often said things that were very cryptic, but had a deeper meaning.During our first rehearsal for the performance of Aura in December 1984 he said to meabout the drummer, `Let him play as if he plays to a tap dancer.' We were working on`Violet,' the last piece for the album, a very, very slow piece. I told the drummer whatMiles had said and he asked me, `What does he mean?' And I said, `I don't know.' Wethought about it, and we guessed that Miles wanted him to keep some energy back, andplay with a mental awareness of a hidden, faster energy. It changed something in our attitude,and made the very slow rhythm lift off. I don't see it as anything else than a wayof getting the best out of the present musical situation. I think it was an intuitive feelinghe had for getting where he wanted to go. He once said to me, `When you conduct anorchestra, you have to smell good.' At the time, I thought, `What the hell does he mean?'Later on I understood that it means to be `on' all the time. `Smell good' means `be aware,'awareness. He was `on' all the time."
By being "`on' all the time," Miles exemplified the unsurpassed dedication and concentrationwith which he approached music. His attitude expressed a deep reverence andrespect, demanding his total, egoless, here-and-now presence, almost as if music was sacredto him. Pianist Chick Corea touched on this when he said, "Miles set an example by theway he loved to make music. He was about making music. That kind of attitude createdan atmosphere in which we all joined, because we all wanted to make music in such a veryconcentrated way." Guitarist Robben Ford recalled, "His presence created such an edge. I'dnever been with anyone who could be so demanding just by his mere presence."
Twenty-five years after working with Miles, saxophonist Sonny Fortune's voicedropped to a whisper when he said, "The whole time I worked with him I was in aweover the magic he had. I walked away from the experience of playing with him feelingthat it was something that I would never forget. I can't explain it at all. Because of thismagic, he didn't have to say much, and he didn't say much. He was one of the personsthat I've met who expressed the least amount of trivia. He didn't talk about much, hedidn't gossip, he didn't seem to be affected by a whole lot of things. He was a cat whoonly said one or two phrases, but it would summarize what you were trying to get to.And he had a knowing about music that you could sense and feel, even if it wasn't necessarilyvisible or describable."
These quotes all describe the same essence, the same attitude, from different perspectives.The analogy with Zen, alluded to by Miller, McLaughlin, and Mikkelborg, is agood way of portraying this. It makes it possible to draw together the perspectives ofmany observers and to create a comprehensive framework for understanding the manycharacteristics that made Miles such a great musical teacher and innovator. Minimalism,here-and-now presence, being awake, awareness, going beyond habit energies, egolessservice to a greater purpose, teaching by example—these are all at the heart of Zen.Miles's love of boxing has parallels with the martial arts aspects of Zen. And like Miles,Zen teachers are traditionally men of few words, while Miles's penchant for cryptic onelinershas parallels with Zen koans.
The listening sense, especially inner listening, is also often associated with Zen, andwith spiritual awareness in general. "Be still, and know that I am God" is a central phrasein Christianity. The original title of The Tibetan Book of the Dead contains the wordhearing, and its most-used invocation is "Listen, ye man of noble birth." In his bookThe World Is Sound, the German author and jazz critic Joachim-Ernst Berendt elaboratedon many aspects of the listening sense in a widely known chapter called "TheTemple in the Ear" (after a phrase by the German poet Rainer Maria Rilke). Berendtargued that our television-obsessed culture has become overly focused on the visual sense,reducing the ears to an "auxiliary organ." He quoted scientific evidence suggesting thatthe listening sense is more pronounced in women and reasoned that listening reflects femininequalities of receptivity and awareness, whereas the penetrating and projecting visual-spatialsense is a masculine trait. According to Berendt, revaluing our listening sense is crucialif we want to rebalance and heal our off-kilter culture; he saw Zen practice as one wayof achieving this, since it is about "wakefulness" and "listening to silence." With hisfocus on the listening sense, Miles contributed to this rebalancing process.
* * *
The aim of introducing spiritual perspectives and making the analogy with Zen is not toput Miles on a spiritual pedestal. To his great credit, Miles undermined any attempts byothers to turn him into a guru. "I stood next to him in Japan when somebody began kissinghis feet, literally," Lydia DeJohnette remembered. "Miles was like, `Stop it!' Mileswas aware of levels that other people aren't. He understood the vibration of music, whatJack called the `essence' of music. So he could have been a guru if he wanted to. The '60sand the '70s were the era of gurus. But he didn't want to be a guru. I think some of hisobnoxious side came from that."
The era of gurus may be over, but the spiritual and transcendental aspects of Miles'sbeing are hinted at too frequently to be ignored. Things transcendental get dozens ofmentions in Miles's autobiography, for example when he says that he believes in "mysteryand the supernatural," "superstition," and "numerology," and that he can "predictthe future." Miles also stated, "I do believe in being spiritual and do believe in spirits ... musicis about the spirit and the spiritual, and about feeling," and repeatedly referredto his clairvoyant side.
Eric Nisenson related how Miles often knew who called before he picked up thephone and could sense someone walking towards his house when they were still a blockaway. "Real Twilight Zone stuff," Nisenson commented. Quincy Troupe claimed inMiles and Me that Miles had a "spiritual, mystical" effect on him, and related how Milestalked to Gil Evans, John Coltrane, Charlie Parker, and others after they died. "He sawand understood things differently," Troupe wrote, "and he seemed to feel and knowthings spiritually, almost to the point of having extrasensory perception."
Miles always seemed to know much more than he articulated, and his often-shortexpressions were so enticing because they always hinted at a much larger, hidden awareness,an intuitive "knowing," as Sonny Fortune and Lydia DeJohnette called it. Miles'snephew, drummer Vince Wilburn Jr., said, "It was innate, a `knowing' gifted people have.With Miles it was almost a clairvoyant thing." And Miles's companion from 1969 to1971, Marguerite Eskridge, remembered how he always gave the impression of knowingmuch more than he expressed. She added, "I honestly couldn't say whether this wasbecause he was searching for the right words, or didn't want to talk about it, or maybethought something like, `doesn't everybody also know these things and understand them?'"
Spirituality does not necessarily overlap with organized religion, for which Miles hadlittle time. "He was not one for God," Jo Gelbard commented, "but he was convincedthat all the concerts and all the sounds he'd ever made were still there, floating aroundsomewhere. That, for instance, his concert on November 12, 1956, was intact somewherein space, and that they would one day invent a machine to play it again. He lovedthat idea!" Miles's idea of music floating around in eternity conjures up associations withthe notion of "music of the spheres" and has a striking parallel with the idea of the"Akashic Records"—an alleged huge cosmic database of everything that ever happened,and a popular concept in New Age circles.
* * *
Robert Fripp, who, like Miles, has a predilection for cryptic but captivating statements,wrote about the difference between the "understanding musician" and the "knowingmusician." "Knowing is an ordering of experience on the outside of our perceptions;understanding is an ordering of our experience on the inside of our perceptions."
In this sense, Miles was a "knowing musician." When listening to the essence ofmusic, Miles had the capacity to hear things that eluded others. He heard "meaning" innotes other musicians missed. He was the aural equivalent of a visionary. This madeMiles a great teacher and a great musician. It gave him the ability to spot potentially greatmusicians, and also to play the kid in the story of the emperor's clothes, ruthlessly pointingout when music or musicians were out of touch with "the musical impulse." Yet, crucially,his strength was not in musical conception. He didn't conceive of the many musicalinnovations that he spearheaded. Instead, he recognized the unique creative possibilitiesin what was being done by his contemporaries, appropriated and developed these inhighly imaginative ways, and communicated his findings to a worldwide audience.
Miles's role was reminiscent of that of the English writer John Aubrey who, one day in1648, walked up a hill next to the English village of Avebury, looked down, and saw somethingthat no one had ever seen before. As long as people could remember, Avebury hadincluded a mysterious circular earthwork and a collection of huge stones. On that dayAubrey suddenly saw the meaning of the stones and earthwork: they made up a prehistoricsite—a larger sister to Stonehenge. When his contemporaries went up to have a look, theyinvariably recognized it, too, and could hardly believe that they had never noticed it before.
A shift in perspective like this is often known as an "aha" or "eureka" experience; wesuddenly "get" something. Moreover, insofar as the new outlook also changed the viewthe villagers had of themselves and of their world, it can be called a "paradigm shift." Thescientist Thomas Kuhn introduced the idea of paradigm shifts, defining paradigms as setsof fundamental assumptions and concepts on which particular views of the world arebased. Most of the time, human knowledge is deepened by working from a particular setof generally agreed premises. But periodically new paradigms emerge. For example, at onepoint describing the movements of the sun and the planets based on the premise that theearth is the center of the universe became too complex, and a new scientific paradigm wasaccepted that sees the earth as circling around the sun. What made this into a paradigmshift, rather than just a shift in perspective on a particular issue, was the enormous ramificationsfor the way mankind looked at itself and its place in the universe. Another, veryliteral, example, is the discovery of the law of perspective in the early Renaissance. Suddenly,all earlier drawings and paintings with their wrong perspectives appeared hopelesslynaive. Human evolution progresses through these kinds of paradigm shifts. The term canapply as much to new ways of looking at the world, art, or music, as to, on a smaller scale,new ways of looking at our village, or our personal life. To discover, say, that we have adifferent father than we thought we had, can be a paradigm shift for an individual.
Paradigm shifts are usually preceded by a prolonged period of personal, political, or culturalturmoil, signaling that the old paradigm doesn't fit anymore. We tend to forget aboutthese wider cultural contexts in which paradigm shifts occur, only remembering the individualpioneers. Their names are familiar. Albert Einstein brought about a paradigm shiftin our thinking about the universe at a time when the natural sciences were feverishly tryingto find new solutions to emerging problems. As part of the rising political awareness inthe 1960s, Martin Luther King Jr. helped shift the American psyche on race issues. CharlesDarwin changed our thinking about our origins in a society that was trying to make senseof the data provided by numerous fossil finds. The Beatles, embedded in the historic eventsof the '60s, brought about a paradigm shift in the music and culture of their era.
Miles Davis, surrounded by the cascading musical and political developments of 1945to 1975, was one of the select group of twentieth-century musicians who initiated severalparadigm shifts. He had a remarkable capacity for capturing and transforming the zeitgeist,for pointing his finger at the stone circle at a time when people were ready to recognizeit. It was this that made him into one of the great artists of the twentieth century,rather than an obscure visionary remembered only by music historians.
Miles's cool jazz, hardbop, and modal jazz experiments each changed the musical perspectiveof the jazz community, causing respected jazz writer Leonard Feather to proclaim,"He has manifestly changed the entire course of an art form three or four times intwenty-five years—an accomplishment no other jazz musician can claim." Miles'sexplorations into jazz-rock and ambient jazz were paradigm shifts that affected not onlythe jazz community but also those beyond. In the context of a visually orientated culture,his listening awareness can also be described in paradigm terms.
In addition, as the first black jazz musician who consistently crossed over into othermusic genres, other cultures, and other countries, Miles transcended the paradigm ofmusical, cultural, and racial segregation. He was one of the first truly universal musicians,going beyond categories, boundaries, and borders of any kind. The effects of his musicaland personal odyssey rippled into the whole of twentieth-century music and culture, andare still with us today.
And finally, Miles instigated a paradigm shift on his musical instrument. BeforeMiles, the jazz trumpet was mostly played with a bright, brassy sound, rich in vibrato.But through Miles's stylistic developments we today hear the jazz trumpet being playedvery differently, sounding more vulnerable, soulful, like a cri de coeur. Trumpeter OluDara observed, "He's singing rather than playing the trumpet. He was using it like thehuman voice. He transformed the mechanical aspect of the instrument. He made itsound like a breath." Saxophonist Wayne Shorter remembered simply, "They calledhim the guy with the strange sound on the trumpet."
The absence of vibrato was the most characteristic aspect of Miles's style, resulting inan unadorned, introverted sound, often with a crack at the beginning of his notes,giving the impression of vulnerability. Miles also tended to play in the gentler, rounder-soundingmiddle and low registers, because he couldn't "hear" the trumpet's high notes.And in 1954 Miles popularized the sound of the trumpet played with a Harmon mutewithout the stem. Combined with the lack of vibrato, and played close to a microphone,this allows for an intimate, tender, but very expressive sound.
There is a widespread misunderstanding that Miles conceived of these approachesbecause of limitations in his trumpet technique, but he already displayed awesome chopson some recordings in the '40s. It is more likely that his innovations emerged from hisastute listening awareness, which made him recognize the significance of sound. "Soundis the most important thing a musician can have, because you can't do anything withouta sound," Miles remarked. "If a musician is interested in his sound, then you can lookfor some good playing."
Miles kept developing as a trumpeter until he reached his technical peak in the late '60s,playing an extroverted and virtuoso form of power trumpet that included its high register.He also established a very personal, wah-wah-inspired electric trumpet style in the '70s.Both his power and his electric trumpet styles retained recognizable elements of his characteristiccracked, voicelike, vibratoless sound, but neither was as influential. In the '80sMiles returned to his original trumpet style, often sounding more cracked and vulnerablethan before because his technique only occasionally rose to its previous heights.
It was Miles's "strange" cri de coeur on the trumpet that had the most universal resonanceand added another color to the palette of human experience. Even if he hadn'tspearheaded several musical revolutions, his place in posterity would be secured purelyfor introducing this horn sound. It was the focal point, the pivot that drew everythinghe did together, the common thread at the heart of all the disparate musical styles andexperiments that he traversed during his epic, forty-six-year-long recording career. Echoingthe story of the Pied Piper of Hameln, the charismatic sound of Miles's horn mademillions follow him into the undiscovered territory he probed.
"When Miles played his horn, everything fell into place ... [and] he spoke to thewhole world," Jack DeJohnette remarked. His wife Lydia added, "Miles spoke more withhis horn than with his mouth. His inner life came out in his music. When you listen tohis horn you can hear sadness, you can hear pain, you can hear everything else. This iswhere he revealed himself."
Miles's touching, deeply human trumpet sound is so moving and compelling becauseof its apparent contradiction with the tough, inscrutable, macho persona that he displayedto the world. The poignant irony that the hard man with the legendary rough, raspy,almost demonic voice—the aftermath of a throat operation in the '50s—played his instrumentwith voicelike lyricism has inflated this contradiction to almost mythical proportions.
Miles's many contradictions, his fierce independence and his leadership abilities, hissensitive, vulnerable sound, his awareness, his listening capacities, and his violence anddrug addiction, epitomized some of the extremes of our human nature.
Marguerite Eskridge recounted how Miles expressed aspects of these extremes privately."Miles was the epitome of the Gemini, Jekyll and Hyde personality. The positiveone was golden; [he] would give anybody anything that they needed, open his door andtake in guys who were out of work, or homeless. The opposite one was just as extreme;[he] had a very violent temper and could be very violent."
A sense of unfathomable darkness and imminent danger often surrounded Miles. Itis hinted at by the more ominous epithets that he received, such as "dark magus," "princeof darkness," and "a puzzle wrapped in an enigma." But the melancholy and vulnerabilityalways shone through. In Miles's horn sound we can always sense the delicate sensitivitythat was also there. We sense his spiritual qualities, the fire of his creativity, andthe light of his authenticity and "knowing," as much as the surrounding looming shadows.We sense his deep humanity, which makes us feel for him and sympathize with him,and we sense the "unexplainable," larger-than-life qualities that urged him to go intoplaces where most of us wouldn't dream of going. He was both one of us and a strangerin a strange land. He was someone on the brink of several paradigms conveying mysterioustales to which we cannot but listen.
Continues...
Excerpted from Miles Beyondby Paul Tingen Copyright © 2003 by Paul Tingen. Excerpted by permission.
All rights reserved. No part of this excerpt may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the publisher.
Excerpts are provided by Dial-A-Book Inc. solely for the personal use of visitors to this web site.
